The quality of television reportage
Honestly, I can’t quite figure out what is worse. The fact Di Butler felt this was of a high enough quality to hand in to her editor, or the fact that the editor then went on to publish it.
Discussion and discourse on any topic simply should be better than this in a publication that offers checks and balances. Why must The Courier Mail show complete contempt for their readership by publishing such woefully sub par writing?
2 Comments to “The quality of television reportage”
Add Comments (+)-
andy says:
OMG!
that is so hilarious……ly bad.
Some people really deserve to be unemployed. It’s the presence of people like this at the Courier which caused me to give it up. It’s a load of hogwash, and Di Buttler is one of it’s ‘stars’
To quote Cartman…’someone got sand in their vagina’
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Leave a Reply
Subscribe to the podcast
White Noise
The 400 Club
Bloody hell! What the frick is that article about?! It has the stench of “will this do?” about it. How did it get published, indeed?! Congrats for picking up on this shocker. Very entertaining.